Zsombor Piros vs Jan Kumstat Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Which player holds the edge when it comes to second serve performance over the past six months? Kumstat has secured 42.29% of points on their second serve, while Piros slightly edges ahead with 44.25%. This statistic is notably linked to predicting match winners with precision. But what about when these players are on the receiving end of a serve?

In terms of return game stats and recent form, Kumstat has captured 43.75% of their opponent's second serve points, while Piros leads with 45.51%. When considering first serve returns, both players have close percentages, with Kumstat achieving 28.21% and Piros 28.88%. This measure is crucial in determining the favored player in head-to-head matchups.

How do they perform under pressure, particularly when saving breakpoints? Kumstat demonstrates resilience, saving 55.41% of breakpoints, whereas Piros saves 49.59%. Such statistics are invaluable for in-game betting scenarios and predictions.

Focusing on their overall performance from the past year, Kumstat has a win rate of only 27.27% (with a record of 3 wins and 8 losses), while Piros has triumphed in 57.14% of his matches (36 wins and 27 losses), providing a broad head-to-head prediction perspective.

When comparing their best surfaces, Kumstat shines on indoor hard courts with a 60% win rate (3 wins and 2 losses) but struggles on clay, winning just 11% of matches (1 win and 8 losses). Conversely, Piros excels on clay, boasting a 66% win rate (187 wins and 97 losses), though his performance dips on hard courts, with a 52% win rate (44 wins and 41 losses).

How do their competitive levels differ? Over the last year, Kumstat mostly competes in Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments with entry fees hovering around $10K, winning just 25% of matches (2 wins and 6 losses). Piros, however, takes on challengers/ITF tournaments with higher stakes, winning 62.26% of his matches (33 wins and 20 losses). The level of competition obviously impacts their stats and predictions.

Analyzing their opponents' quality, Kumstat has faced players with an average rank of 335 over the past year, whereas Piros has competed against higher-ranked players, averaging a rank of 281.65. But who performs better when the match reaches a deciding set?

If it comes to that crucial final set, Kumstat unfortunately struggles, having won 0% of deciding sets in the past year. In stark contrast, Piros exhibits confidence, winning 55% of all such encounters on tour.

Turning to current H2H stats from the event, we must give weight to performance as the event unfolds, as well as player tendencies at specific tournaments, when predicting outcomes. Under breakpoint scenarios in recent form, Kumstat has a low conversion rate of 21.74%, whereas Piros more successfully turns opportunities into breaks at 32.74%. These metrics are essential for live betting enthusiasts.

Considering all these stats, it's a compelling case in favor of Piros when predicting who might win this encounter. His overall match performance, return game strength, deciding set fortitude, and breakpoint conversion capabilities clearly place him as the favored player.